Consensus? and Question

James Jordan · 13 Jul 2002, 01:54 · from urth-v0207.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Consensus? and Question
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:54:50 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0207-1344 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0207/1344.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay. Just wondering. Didn't want to be . . . LEFT BEHIND!

Nutria

At 09:14 PM 7/12/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>At 8:24 PM -0500 7/12/02, James Jordan wrote:
>>         Anyway, I wondered if there is a consensus, and if I'm on the=20
>> right track.
>
>I, for one, don't agree with the "Horn in Babbie" theory. And my sense is=20
>that there is no real consensus on most of the issues in the Short Sun=20
>books. Just look at the range of opinions just expressed about whether or=20
>not Silk committed suicide.
>--
>
>William Ansley
>
>--

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net