Some Scattered Thoughts: some short, one very long.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 15 Jul 2002, 18:53
· from urth-v0207.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: (urth) Some Scattered Thoughts: some short, one very long.
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:53:59 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0207-1372 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0207/1372.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1. Silk's relationship with Hyacinth. This simply cannot be understood
outside of the context of the (very short) book of the prophet Hosea=20
in the Bible. To summarize thematically: Hosea, at God's command,=20
marries a whore and repeatedly forgives her straying; this is intended=20
as a metaphor for God's relationship with Israel (and, in Christian=20
understanding, also for Christ's relationship with the Church).=20
2. Can someone explain to me why people have trouble believing that=20
Silk might have gashed his arms in grief? Not only is this clearly=20
established as a grieving practice in Viron (see, for example,=20
Orpine's funeral); it is a well established historically as a practice=20
in the "real" world. And, as Nutria so succintly put it, "I don't=20
think this skilled auger tried to kill himself and failed."=20
3. Regarding the identity of Silk and/or his parents ... I wonder if=20
they might not be Typhon's parents; that is, whether Silk might in=20
fact be a clone taken from Typhon's own cells? Consider Typhon's=20
concern for the "face of command" which drives him to the whole-head=20
transplant, with all its inconveniences, he chooses over a simple=20
brain transplant. Is it possible, or even likely, that Typhon's own=20
success is due to the "leader" geneplex which marks Silk out? Might=20
not Typhon have wanted his own "face of command" back when he became=20
incarnate again at the starcrosser's arrival? And would a "better"=20
person grown from the same biogenetic substrate not be the ideal=20
persona to blend with the dead-alive Pas, to bring him back to full=20
life in Mainframe? This is just a hunch, but it seems worth exploring.
(Later: Just saw Mantis' suggestion that they might be the mortal
versions of Kypris and Pas. Interesting ... and it would also provide=20
a way of conveying Pas's geneplex for leadership to his next body.)
4. (This is the very long one.)
No, Nutria, there is _not_ -- at this point, anyway -- a consensus=20
that Horn is moved into Babbie at the end of OBW. There is some=20
evidence that he is moved (or copied) to Babbie, possibly/probably at=20
that point, but no certainty by any means, and strong evidence that=20
the Horn persona is still present e.g. when Hide recognizes his father=20
in the Narrator during his (Hide's) first astral trip to Green.=20
I'm beginning to think I see a way out of this maze, but it's kind of=20
complicated.=20
What is moved from Horn's body to Silk's? Is it his "soul"? His=20
"spirit" (which is spoken of several times through the course of the=20
Books)? A "memory stream," as someone put it recently? A=20
"personality"? Or ...?
*
* *
One of the great problems facing any serious soulist today is the=20
increasingly clear evidence of how much of memory and behavior is
organic in behavior.=20
Suppose George takes a blow to the head and loses all his memory; when=20
he regains consciousness, he is in essence a new person, and the=20
personality he exhibits is quite different. Now, is there a new soul=20
inhabiting or animating this body? Or is the "soul" something quite=20
different from (conscious) memory and (the external manifestations of)=20
personality? This is important to any soulist -- such as Wolfe, or=20
myself -- trying to understand just what this "immortal part" _is_.
Consider, similarly, someone who suffers a less extreme cranial=20
trauma. He retains all memory, but is drastically changed -- there are=20
cases of a "normal" person becoming antisocial, even vicious, after a=20
head blow. This is extremely problematic for the soulist: if physical=20
trauma can cause a person to become thus loveless and (at least=20
outwardly) sinful, is the soul thereby damned, though there is no free=20
choice? A radical Calvinist _might_ have no problem with this; most=20
other Christians are made a bit more uncomfortable when the problem is=20
stated thus baldly.
Taking this as a starting place, we can begin to see the Books (all=20
three of them) as, in part at least, an exploration of what these=20
various things -- soul, spirit, memory, personality -- are and how=20
they relate.=20
*
* *
In tBotNS, the most conspicuous explorations of these questions are=20
the various memory-transfers using the analeptic alzabo; the alzabo=20
itself; and Jonas.=20
In the general use of the analeptic alzabo, memories and nothing more=20
seem to be transferred to the eater from the eaten.=20
In the special case of Severian and Thecla, it _appears_ that he (who=20
has shown a propensity for resurrecting the dead) actually brings her=20
soul or spirit or whatever to codwell in his body; however, this may=20
be no more than an appearance: it may simply be that he (who also has=20
a particularly strong capacity for memory) is an unusually fit=20
receptacle for memory. Yet, once or twice, he speaks in Thecla's=20
persona, and once or twice, someone sees a woman "with" him who seems=20
to be Thecla. So that's ambiguous, at least for now.
The alzabo itself seems to be better "adapted" than the general run of=20
humans for absorbing devoured memories, which is sensible enough given=20
its apparent evolutionary strategy. This adaptation is good enough=20
that (like Severian with Thecla) it actually seems to incarnate the=20
personality of its victims, to the point where, having devoured and=20
"become" the father of little Severian, it willingly(?) sacrifices=20
itself to save its "wife" and "child." To some extent, then, the=20
personality of the victim is more in control than that of the alzabo=20
itself which, presumably, would not care about them except as food.=20
(Actually, the two personalities seem almost perfectly blended in the=20
nocturnal standoff, when the alzabo's hunger and the man's desire to=20
be reunited with his wife seek the same physical result, the=20
assimilation of the wife.)
Finally there is Jonas: who is the first person(ality) we know of, in=20
the Books, to leap from one body to another -- he seems to possess the
body of Miles in much the way that Horn will later possess that of
Silk, although with far less reason/excuse given for it. The=20
personality of the resurrected Miles does not really seem all that
much like Jonas, but occasionally exhibits bits of Jonasosity, to the
point where Severian is, at last, able to recognize his presence. In
the event, the Jonas persona seems to flee upon being told that=20
Jolenta is dead.
What I'm looking at here is a possible comparison to the relationship
between Horn and Silk in the person of the Narrator. In both cases, a
new personality is grafted into a severely damaged person (in the case
of the Narrator, it's Silk's "spirit" which is severely damaged rather=20
than his body, which is moderately damaged). Over time, the primary
personality seems to heal and, at last, the grafted personality=20
leaves.
Obviously there are remarkable differences -- for example, that the
grafted personality is the "foreground" personality in the case of the
Narrator but the "background" personality in the case of Miles-Jonas.
But the similarities are interesting enough to bear in mind as we move
forward.
*
* *
I'm running out of time for this right now. Let me summarize:
In tBotSS, we need to examine (at least) the translation of Typhon and
his friends-and-relations to Mainframe; "divine" possession; Mucor;
Silk's vision of his parents; and the rather horrible "afterlife"=20
Mainframe seems to give to the people of the _Whorl_.
In tBotLS, we have to add the nature and interrelationships between=20
Silk, Horn, "the Narrator," Pig, Babbie, and Pas; Scylla-in-Oreb; the=20
nature of inhumi intelligence and personality; astral travel by=20
inhumu; and possibly some understanding of what and where the=20
Neighbors are.=20
*
* *
My tentative conclusions are as follows. Note that for all these, the=20
implicit condition is "in the Lupiverse" (which we may regard as
related to the "real" universe by virtue of this being [my guesses at]=20
Wolfe's speculations about how it "really" works).
1. "Soul" and/or "spirit" may or may not be the same thing, but they=20
are clearly NOT the same as "brain data" about memory and personality -- the
latter being what is transferred to Mainframe or in the=20
mechanism of the alzabo. (An extraordinarily important piece of=20
evidence here is Pig's ability to "see" Mucor even though he can't=20
synch with Mainframe.)
2. Memory/personality "brain data" affect, and are affected by, "soul/=20
spirit." There is clearly a relationship between these (at least) two=20
things, but what that relationship is is, thus far, not clear.
3. I _think_ that what is transferred from Horn to the Narrator is of
the nature of soul/spirit, rather than "brain data" as such: which
implies that soul/spirit in fact carries memory with it, independent
of the physical "brain data" memory. (This is, for the soullist, a
somewhat comforting way of thinking about it.)
More? Probably. Later.
--Blattid
--=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net