Silk-23 apology

Adam Stephanides · 19 Jul 2002, 14:50 · from urth-v0207.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Silk-23 apology
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:50:19 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0207-1442 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0207/1442.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

As Nutria said, no need to apologize; it was an interesting discussion.  And
you're not the only one to hold the Silk-reboot model; in fact, it may be
the majority view among those who've posted on the topic.  And I haven't
reread LS/SS either.  (No need to apologize for not wanting to continue the
discussion, either.)

And thanks for posting on "Thou Spark of Blood."  Sounds like something
worth looking for after all, though not worth paying an exorbitant amount
for.

--Adam

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net