Another Avern for you
Bratt Ian · 30 Jul 2002, 19:23
· from urth-v0207.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Bratt Ian <Ian.Bratt at Colorado.EDU> Subject: RE: (urth) Another Avern for you Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:23:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <urth-v0207-1487 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0207/1487.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Crush wrote: > Hmmm. I thought they were "shadowless" because they were in continuous da= rk? > Although, no doubt they interpreted it the other way. But the Ascians are > under the control Erebus (Erebus according to Hesiod is the "darkness of > Tartaros") > > Severian is the New Sun, the roses (which are sun symbols) represent life, > nenuphars whose roots extend to the darkness of the water represent death. > > Surely darkness is ironically the intended implication of the name "Ascia= n". > > -- Crush > Interesting idea. I've always thought they were "shadowless" because of their lack of individuality. If we take the route that to have a shadow is to have a soul (Vampires have no reflection) and to have a soul is to be human, then the Ascians have lost what makes them human. In this case, I've always considered that to be their individuality. Although I find the darkness theory reasonable and even somewhat similar. -Ian --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net