annoying silliness

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 01 Aug 2002, 00:14 · from urth-v0208.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) annoying silliness
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:14:37 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0208-1505 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0208/1505.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sigh.

Okay, let me clarify things here ...

I believe my original statement was:

> I was quite certain, reading the utterances of Loyal
> to the Group of Seventeen, that Wolfe was pointing his
> barb at Maoism and the "Little-read Book." Others, I
> have learned on this list, have been equally certain
> that Wolfe is satirizing Orwell's "Newspeak," which I
> find simply implausible.

Okay, that was way too strong ... I think I had better
have said that I find it implausible that "Newspeak" was
the primary target of the satire.

I frankly feel that the insistence that it _is_, is an
example of the parochialism of the SF community; there
is (imho) extremely powerful evidence, both biographical=20
and stylistic, for Maoist-style Communism as the primary
target.=20

I would also dispute one point of facticity in Mantis'
latest post on this subject:

> Was blattid aware that Mao's little red book had not=20
> historically been used across an entire culture the way
> that it had been used, anecdotally, by a couple of
> Berkeleyites in the 70s?  Yes, he was aware (a relief,=20
> in a sense).

I said no such thing, nor am I convinced by any means that
you are correct here. It is my understanding that a major
aspect of Chinese Communist culture of the later Mao years,
and probably through the next few years after his death,=20
_was_ the frequent quoting of Mao. I am unwilling to do the
research to "prove" this right now, but will stick to my
guns on the point unless and until strong counterevidence
is posed; I admit this is stubbornness on my part, but it's
stubbornness based on my memory of the period.
=20
--Blattid


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net