Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth

William Ansley · 07 Sep 2002, 05:01 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: William Ansley <wansley at warwick.net>
Subject: Re: FW: (urth) FW: Elucidations of the Long Sun:Hyacinth
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 01:01:28 -0400
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1691 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1691.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 1:22 PM -0500 8/31/02, James Wynn wrote:
>2.   Horn alludes to his suspicions regarding Silk's true heritage, to whi=
ch
>Silk finally answers, "There are so many lies in the whorl...May I instance
>you one more? Hyacinth subdued our pilot, Hyacinth alone." How is that a l=
ie
>if the fight went the way you describe it? If it went like Marble's fight
>with Musk (as I infer) then there really is something else going on.

Hello, Crush.

I *finally* caught up with all the messages generated in response to=20
your quite interesting ideas and I have a comment to make. But first=20
I must warn you that, if anyone is, I am part of the "not ... large=20
contingent on the list" that Robert Borski warned you about in his=20
message of 8/28/02, the members of which will subject you to "a=20
certain amount of ridicule, scorn, and derision." I certainly don't=20
intend to submit you to such things, but I never meant to do so to=20
Robert, either, so apparently I can't help it.

I don't agree with you on the necessity of Hyacinth being a chem. In=20
fact, we seem to be interpreting Wolfe's words so radically=20
differently, I doubt we can agree on much. You cite Silk's line=20
"There are so many lies in the whorl...May I instance you one more?=20
Hyacinth subdued our pilot, Hyacinth alone." as support for the idea=20
that Hyacinth is a chem, if I understand you correctly. It seems to=20
me to be just the opposite.

Your reasoning seems to be:
-Hyacinth did defeat the pilot alone.
-A normal flesh and blood woman would have had a very hard time doing=20
this while a chem would have had an easy time of it.
-Therefore, it is very likely that Hyacinth is a chem.
-Silk is aware there is something fishy about how Hyacinth defeated=20
the pilot so he say the line above.

But surely, the statement "Hyacinth subdued our pilot, Hyacinth=20
alone." is *true* if Hyacinth defeated the pilot by herself, whether=20
she is a chem or a bio. The only thing that would make it a lie is if=20
she *had help from someone else*! I have no idea what form this help=20
might have taken or who it was from (or even if she really did have=20
help) but the way I interpret Silk's remark is that he suspects that=20
Hyacinth had help, not that she is a chem with super-strength. If=20
Silk had said something along the lines of "There are so many lies in=20
the whorl...May I instance you one more? Hyacinth subdued our pilot,=20
Hyacinth, a mere weak, flesh-and-blood woman." then I'd say you had a=20
point.
--=20

William Ansley

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net