Chem power

Andy Robertson · 09 Sep 2002, 04:38 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) Chem power
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 05:38:26 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1703 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1703.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

But::  Fusion would create a neutron flux which would turn many of the
ordinary elements the generator was composed of into radioactive isotopes.
Particularly if the generator had been running for hundreds of years.

Another reason why I doubt Hyacinth was a chem or a chem with a bio shell -
the radiation would be bad for living flesh acually in contact with the
chem, though it is short range and would not hurt people in the same room
(much).

    hartshorn



----- Original Message ----- eutron flux
From: "Bratt Ian" <Ian.Bratt at Colorado.EDU>
To: "urth" <urth at urth.net>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: (urth) Chem power


>
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote:
> >     "Five chains away, the blade of the azoth wrecked a fusion
generator,
> > and the soldier whose heart it had been died." (LS3, 9)
> >
> > But, but . . . that's just another good reason to shoot those fool
engineers
> > who designed them! If chems were subject to exploding and raining
> > radioactive material all around when they died, then they were a hazard
to
> > every bio around them, including their fellow human troopers. Dumb. But
> > then, Typhon didn't care about people, did he?
> >
> > -Roy
>
> A quick technical point:  Roy, you seem to be confusing fission and
> fusion.  Fission, what powers modern power plants, is the process of
> massive nuclei breaking apart and releasing energy.  Radioactivity is a
> natural byproduct of this process.  Fusion, however, is the process of
> lighter nuclei fusing together to make a more massive nuclei.  Large
> amounts of energy are released during fusion, but with significantly less
> radioactive emissions (on order of 10^9 less than fission).
>
> http://wwwofe.er.doe.gov/More_HTML/Comparison_w_fission.GIF
>
> Unfortunately for society, commercially available fusion generators are
> still science fiction.  I don't think those "fool engineers" would
> appreciate you being so trigger happy :)
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
>
>
> --
>
>


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net