Chem power

Andy Robertson · 09 Sep 2002, 13:58 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) Chem power
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:58:13 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1712 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1712.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, even then.  You cannae break the laws of physics, captain, etc etc.

    hartshorn


----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
To: <urth at urth.net>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: (urth) Chem power


> > But::  Fusion would create a neutron flux which would turn many of the
> > ordinary elements the generator was composed of into=20
> > radioactive isotopes.
>=20
> Not if you reverse the polarity on the neutrino flow.
>=20
> Yours for better technobabble,
>=20
> --Blattid
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
>=20


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net