The cenoby files

Roy C. Lackey · 24 Sep 2002, 04:16 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) The cenoby files
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:16:00 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1761 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1761.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

mantis wrote:
>Let's stop there.
>
>Fact: Marble hasn't been there in 184 years.
>Fact: Marble supposes that nobody had been up there for a century.
>
>The crux of your point seems to be that Marble implies or believes that she
>saw the trunk there on her last visit, 184 years earlier (a paradox), but
>as I read over the text in the book it seems to me that Marble does =3Dnot=
=3D
>say that she saw the trunk there on her last visit (184 years earlier).

No, no. Your reading of the text is correct; she did not see the trunk on a
visit 184 years ago. As I said in the second paragraph: "But both trips to
the attic came after Rose's death."

>Thus, it resolves: the last time she went up into the attic she was a maid,
>then she put away her maid gear and became a sibyl, at which point =3Dsome=
one
>else=3D put her footlocker up in the attic, and now she enters the attic to
>see an unfamiliar trunk which is her forgotten old life.  Her supposition
>about the amount of time since anybody else had been up there is simply
>wrong.
>
>Or am I once again missing something?

She may have been wrong, on the first of those two trips to the attic, about
it being 184 years ago when, still a graceful girl, she had last pulled down
those attic steps--I have no way of knowing. She may be wrong, too, about no
one else having been up there in over a century (the amount of time the
door-hooking tool had been lost)--again, I have no way of knowing. But was
she also wrong about having been a teacher and sibyl for only fifty-odd
years? She said she started teaching when Pike was a young augur. If she was
right about teaching only for the last fifty-odd years, then that trunk
can't hold her old maid gear; not if no one has opened that attic door for
more than a century. That's why I'm puzzled.

-Roy

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net