The cenoby files

Michael Andre-Driussi · 24 Sep 2002, 14:25 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) The cenoby files
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:25:29 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1762 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1762.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roy wrote:
>No, no. Your reading of the text is correct; she did not see the trunk on a
>visit 184 years ago. As I said in the second paragraph: "But both trips to
>the attic came after Rose's death."

It might just be me, but I find myself confused to distraction by your use
of number of trips in this case.  (Not that it is your fault, just that it
is all confusing.)  I mean, we are really talking about three trips: the
"last one" 184 years ago (year 148) and two trips on a day in year 332.  If
you are saying that the two trips in 332 happened after Rose's death, I
agree with you, but I don't understand why you are bringing it up.

>>Thus, it resolves: the last time she went up into the attic she was a mai=
d,
>>then she put away her maid gear and became a sibyl, at which point =3Dsom=
eone
>>else=3D put her footlocker up in the attic, and now she enters the attic =
to
>>see an unfamiliar trunk which is her forgotten old life.  Her supposition
>>about the amount of time since anybody else had been up there is simply
>>wrong.
>>
>>Or am I once again missing something?
>
>She may have been wrong, on the first of those two trips to the attic, abo=
ut
>it being 184 years ago when, still a graceful girl, she had last pulled do=
wn
>those attic steps--I have no way of knowing. She may be wrong, too, about =
no
>one else having been up there in over a century (the amount of time the
>door-hooking tool had been lost)--again, I have no way of knowing. But was
>she also wrong about having been a teacher and sibyl for only fifty-odd
>years? She said she started teaching when Pike was a young augur. If she w=
as
>right about teaching only for the last fifty-odd years, then that trunk
>can't hold her old maid gear; not if no one has opened that attic door for
>more than a century. That's why I'm puzzled.

If I understand it correctly, all Marble has to be wrong about is her guess
that it has been a century or more since someone went up there.  The trunk
is there, ergo someone was up there fifty years ago to drop off a trunk
(not to clean the attic, mind you, just drop off a trunk: so the trunk
itself has only 50 years of dust upon it while the attic has nearly the
amount of two centuries!).

=3Dmantis=3D

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net