Jonas <> Pinocchio

Michael Andre-Driussi · 25 Sep 2002, 20:17 · from urth-v0209.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: (urth) Jonas <> Pinocchio
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:17:53 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0209-1781 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0209/1781.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jerry Friedman and Roy Lackey disagree with my casting Jonas as wanting to
become fully bio.  I guess I should have preped my statement with
qualifiers, since while I believe "Jonas Pinocchio" is a possible reading,
and may be required for some, I myself do not hold it too tightly,
preferring Tin Man and Tin Soldier.

Since I was responding to the posts of others, it seems I should have
written something like "Such a reading would seem to require that Jonas =3D
Pinocchio, whereas 98% of the time we talk of Jonas =3D Tin Man and/or Jonas
=3D Steadfast Tin Soldier.  OTOH, if Jonas =3D Pinocchio, then Miles repres=
ents
his wish come true, in contrast to Jonas =3D Tin Man, where Miles represents
the opposite of his wish, a cruel torment which is then furthered by the
knowledge that Jolenta has already died."

Jerry wrote:
>Can we
>imagine a prosthetic-bearing bio in love with a chem wanting to become
>fully a chem?

Putting aside the "doing it for Love" angle . . . Uh, would that be the
horde of boys who play at being robots?  Represented in animation by Fry,
the 20th century guy in "Futurama," who tells Bender he wanted a robot
friend (or to be a robot?) since he was five years old; and Fry has
fantasies about being a robot?   Andy Warhol's phrase "I want to be a
machine"?  All the starry-eyed singularity adventists who long to be
"uploaded"?

This is hard to imagine?

(Jerry asked for the source of Steadfast Tin Soldier: Hans Christian Anders=
en.)

But then Roy goes further, into his "lusty robot" kick:

>All the more reason to wonder what he wanted with Jolenta.

Again, Roy, you seem to be saying that Love is impossible without, er,
compatible sexual interface devices.  I mentioned this before, I don't
recall that you answered: Is Love impossible for Jonas because he is a
robot, or is it impossible because his beloved is a bio, or is non-sexual
Love simply impossible?

=3Dmantis=3D

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net