Blue as Ushas
Chris · 17 Nov 2002, 11:30
· from urth-v0211.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Chris" <rasputin_ at hotmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Blue as Ushas Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:30:24 +0000 Message-ID: <urth-v0211-2127 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0211/2127.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the welcome, Roy I agree with your point here, though perhaps for different reasons. The=20 religious aspects are open to a very wide amount of interpretation, and=20 whether you believe Blue is Ushas or not you can choose to take it=20 negatively and nothing stops you. I look at the question like this: asking if Blue is Ushas is somewhat akin=20 to asking if Ushas is Urth. Perhaps, in a sense, they are? But in the most=20 important sense they're different, and have different meanings, which go=20 along with the different names. This, to me, is far more important than the=20 argument over the means of how Blue might be Ushas. In this sense I feel=20 you're dead on in bringing the "higher" level into it. To Don: Thank you for your welcome as well. Unfortunately I think your red star is another red herring. Silk did see=20 this star at least once, in the enlightenment given him by the Outsider,=20 along with a lot of other knowledge of history, etc. One can easily argue=20 that Silk's enlightenment is false or partially mistaken (certainly Crane=20 would agree). But to attack that is to attack a lot of other things, some o= f=20 which are integral to all of our understanding of the novels. CP >Let us posit--strictly for the sake of argument--that Blue is Ushas. How >does that affect the overall picture Wolfe has drawn in the 12 SUN books? >That is, is it consonant with the religious underpinnings Wolfe has given >the extended series? _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.=20 http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/featuredemail --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net