Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Blue as Ushas

Chris · 17 Nov 2002, 11:30 · from urth-v0211.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Chris" <rasputin_ at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Blue as Ushas
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:30:24 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0211-2127 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0211/2127.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for the welcome, Roy

I agree with your point here, though perhaps for different reasons. The=20
religious aspects are open to a very wide amount of interpretation, and=20
whether you believe Blue is Ushas or not you can choose to take it=20
negatively and nothing stops you.

I look at the question like this: asking if Blue is Ushas is somewhat akin=20
to asking if Ushas is Urth. Perhaps, in a sense, they are? But in the most=20
important sense they're different, and have different meanings, which go=20
along with the different names. This, to me, is far more important than the=20
argument over the means of how Blue might be Ushas. In this sense I feel=20
you're dead on in bringing the "higher" level into it.

To Don: Thank you for your welcome as well.

Unfortunately I think your red star is another red herring. Silk did see=20
this star at least once, in the enlightenment given him by the Outsider,=20
along with a lot of other knowledge of history, etc. One can easily argue=20
that Silk's enlightenment is false or partially mistaken (certainly Crane=20
would agree). But to attack that is to attack a lot of other things, some o=
f=20
which are integral to all of our understanding of the novels.

CP

>Let us posit--strictly for the sake of argument--that Blue is Ushas. How
>does that affect the overall picture Wolfe has drawn in the 12 SUN books?
>That is, is it consonant with the religious underpinnings Wolfe has given
>the extended series?



_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.=20
http://join.msn.com/?page=3Dfeatures/featuredemail


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net