probable distance from Urth to Bleen

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 02 Dec 2002, 23:13 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) probable distance from Urth to Bleen
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:13:12 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2330 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2330.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Um, no, Jerry . . . when the Whorl is at rest, the Whorl=3D20
> people experience time at the same flow as people on Urth or=3D20
> Blue or Green, but at near-light speeds subjective time (the=3D20
> passage of time experienced by the crew) is compressed=3D20
> compared to the objective time of the rest of the universe=3D20
> (or technically "any other location that is not accelerated=3D20
> to NAFAL velocities," which happens to encompass most of the=3D20
> universe).  This is the basis of the famous "twin paradox." =3D20
> (I'm not coining the use of "objective" and "subjective"=3D20
> here: that is how it is done.)  Look into it, if you like,=3D20
> since it is fascinating!  Or just take my word for it.

Um, no, Mantis ... in a world that obeys Einstein's rules,=3D20
"time" is equally [ob|sub]jective in any inertial reference
frame; more specifically, "time" on the Whorl cruising at
NAFAL velocities is no more and no less objective than "time"=3D20
on the surface of Urth. This is a consequence of "time" not=3D20
being an independent entity in such a world; it is one=3D20
dimension of a four-or-more-dimensional manifold which we=3D20
(more) properly refer to as "spacetime."

The "objective time"/"subjective time" terminology you use
comes, not from relativistic physics, but from SF writers=3D20
who play with these concepts in their novels but either=3D20
do not comprehend what I oversimplify in the previous
paragraph, or else assume (and I think this quite likely)
that most "users" of NAFAL ships would think this way, the
non-absolute nature of spacetime in an Einsteinian universe
being kind of difficult to wrap one's head around. (I do
not claim to have my head all the way around it by any
means!)=3D20

--Blattid

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net