probable distance from Urth to Bleen

matthew.malthouse · 03 Dec 2002, 09:56 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk
Subject: RE: (urth) probable distance from Urth to Bleen
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 09:56:44 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2341 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2341.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




On 02/12/2002 20:19:19 James Wynn wrote:

>Nice caluculations Mantis, however if one insists that Silk's Time
coexists
>with Severian's Time then these numbers won't do. Wolfe puts Severian's
time
>1000 to 2000 years after Typhon's.

Ummmm......     And the quotes that establish this are?

Somewhere amongst the papers on my desks are the notes I took on last
reading regarding time and chronology.  I'll try and dig them out.

Matthew



--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net