Professor Jerry lines 'em up

Michael Andre-Driussi · 04 Dec 2002, 17:08 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Andre-Driussi <mantis at siriusfiction.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Professor Jerry lines 'em up
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:08:46 -0800
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2361 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2361.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Professor Jerry wrote:
>When I thought about it, I thought that my reasons for
>not mentioning my Ph. D. were better than my reasons for revealing it,
>so I probably should have stayed "in the closet".

I strongly disagree: not mentioning it upfront was what made it a
back-alley ambush of a housewife by an academician.  In the animal kingdom
this is predatory camouflage.

I think it is clear that I was addressing a person who seemed to be
exhibiting Newtonian thought.  Without the "Ph.D. in Physics" context, the
tagging of "Urth time" and "Whorl time" looked non-Einsteinian, and rather
Newtonian: the poster's unwritten, perhaps even unexamined assumption (like
blattid's non-Einsteinian initial and secondary estimates of the distance
between Urth and Breen systems) might well be something as simple and clean
as "Whorl years are 3 Urth years long," since after all, this will
establish how 333 years can equal 1000 years.  The point of my response was
to gesture at the wonder of time dilation as an Einsteinian reality (the
counterintuitive gulf between the universes of Newton and Einstein) and to
state the fact that I did not coin the terms.

Professor Jerry wrote:
>By the way, we covered S. R. in my Conceptual Physics class today,
>and I used rough approximations to your numbers as an example, with a
>plug for TBotLS.  Thanks!

You are not welcome.  I will strive to avoid similar alleys and people in
the future.  And you should do your own calculations to avoid the taint of
pseudoscience and other academician nasties.

=3Dmantis=3D

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net