The "Number Five = Five Gen
Tony Ellis · 06 Apr 1998, 16:01
· from urth-v0009.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: tony.ellis at futurenet.co.uk (Tony Ellis)
Subject: (urth) The "Number Five = Five Gen
Date: 6 Apr 1998 17:01:44 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0009-0716 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0009/0716.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]
=20
06/04/98
13:54
The "Number Five =3D3D Five Generations" Theory
Some interesting ideas on "Number Five" equating to five
generations of clones. Here are my latest thoughts:
Robert Borski:
The only slight problem I have with your interpretation is that you
count Mr. Million twice, once as a human being and again as the
simulator, which feels like cheating to me! Since the simulator is
a faithful copy of the original person, I don't think they can be
regarded as separate entities to the extent that the various clones
are.
And don't forget that Dr Marsch says that the first GW was=20
someone "neither of you have ever seen". If Mr Million was
the first GW, that would mean that Maitre never saw his own
grandfather; in any event, Number Five and Maitre can see Mr
Million's face in his screen. So for this reason too I don't think
Mr Million can be simulating the original GW.
If I'm going to go along with the Five Generations theory I think
I'll have to take Pedro Jorge's interpretation, where there is still
another "Gene Wolfe" behind Mr Million, who was the first.
Having said that, do we know for sure that even Mr Million's=20
"father", Number Five's great-great-grandfather, was the first of
the line? Dr Marsch's remark could be taken to suggest that
the line of clones stretches back quite far. This is why I'm not=20
dropping my theory that Fifth equates to "Fifth Head of the=20
Family" either.
And here's another reason:
"if, as I had always thought of them, the three heads represented
Maitre, Madame and Mr Million... then indeed a fourth would have
to be welded into place soon for David himself"
This basically foregrounds the idea that the heads of Cerberus
represent the (living) heads of the family. If the number five does
equate to five generations, it definitely equates to the five
family heads too.
>I submit that Phaedria, Number Five's early love interest (and later his
>housemate) is his sister, the biological daughter of Maitre.
Ingenious, but...=20
To tackle your points in order: (1) If Maitre had sold his daughter to
Phaedria's parents, why should they now hope, as they do, to
marry her back into his family? (2) The broken ankle\Aunt=20
Jeannine link seems very tenuous: a broken ankle really isn't that
much like having no legs at all! (3) If Phaedria's name is supposed
to be a classical allusion, why not actually name her after someone
who committed incest with her brother, rather than a stepson? (4)
I'm not sure I understand why you think letting his girls attend the
play would further any designs Maitre might have.
Another objection is that Aunt Jeannine looks strongly like Maitre.
You would expect any sister of Number Five's to have the old
family likeness too.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net