The "Number Five = Five Gen

Pedro Jorge Romero · 06 Apr 1998, 15:35 · from urth-v0009.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Pedro Jorge Romero <bempjr at redkbs.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) The "Number Five = Five Gen
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 16:35:18 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0009-0717 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0009/0717.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

> Robert Borski:
> The only slight problem I have with your interpretation is that you
> count Mr. Million twice, once as a human being and again as the
> simulator, which feels like cheating to me! Since the simulator is
> a faithful copy of the original person, I don't think they can be
> regarded as separate entities to the extent that the various clones
> are.

I have the same problem. I can not count him twice.

> And don't forget that Dr Marsch says that the first GW was
> someone "neither of you have ever seen". If Mr Million was
> the first GW, that would mean that Maitre never saw his own
> grandfather; in any event, Number Five and Maitre can see Mr
> Million's face in his screen. So for this reason too I don't think
> Mr Million can be simulating the original GW.
>=20
> If I'm going to go along with the Five Generations theory I think
> I'll have to take Pedro Jorge's interpretation, where there is still
> another "Gene Wolfe" behind Mr Million, who was the first.

Here is my theory. The original GW is the baby with the girl in the
picture Jeannine shows #5. After all, she says she is the his true
mother, so it is easy to figure out the girl is the mother of the
original GW and the baby is #1.

And just speculating: is that a picture of Gene Wolfe's real mother?

> And here's another reason:
> "if, as I had always thought of them, the three heads represented
> Maitre, Madame and Mr Million... then indeed a fourth would have
> to be welded into place soon for David himself"

But that's just what he "always thought". He could be wrong.

> Another objection is that Aunt Jeannine looks strongly like Maitre.
> You would expect any sister of Number Five's to have the old
> family likeness too.

Is Jeannine the "control" in the previous experiment? Then, why a girl?
A boy, like David, would make much more sense?

Best

Pedro Jorge

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net