I recant. but I wasn't REALLY wrong

William Ansley · 17 Dec 2002, 06:28 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: William Ansley <wansley at warwick.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) I recant. but I wasn't REALLY wrong
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:28:14 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2439 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2439.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 4:47 PM -0700 12/16/02, maa32 wrote:
>Mr. Wolfe has weighed in.  I don't know if I can even post about short sun
>anymore.
>I know the truth now :(

It sounds like you were enlightened, Marc, unless it was just a brain=20
embolism. <g>
--=20

William Ansley

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net