Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Silk Out of Time?

James Jordan · 17 Dec 2002, 18:21 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: RE: (urth) Silk Out of Time?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:21:08 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2450 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2450.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 11:53 AM 12/17/2002, you wrote:
>Nutria wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure we're supposed to think time "passed" for Silk
> > either. He had an instantaneous and transcendent "moment"
> > that sorted itself out in his mind afterwards into its various
> > components, some of which he could not remember. This may not
> > be correct, but I don't see any reason what it is not.
>
>"You may be right about this, and certainly I would not go
>so far as to say that you were wrong, but still ...!" (Place
>_that_ quote for double credit.)
>
>What makes me think that Silk's experience has some kind of
>internal sequentiality: he has the sense of someone (the
>Outsider) speaking into both his ears. Now, I may simply
>put too much emphasis on that detail, but it seems to me that
>speech has a kind of inherent sequentiality to it.
>
>Of course, this may simply mean that he _remembers_ it that
>way.

Yeah, that's how I took it. The event looked like a moment of "eternity,"=20
and having nothing to do with the passage of time, but Silk could only=20
understand it in temporal terms. I can go with the other option, that Silk=20
had a minute or two of "sempiternality," but I thought the instantaneous=20
view was simpler. Perhaps a very close reading of the text would solve the=20
issue.

Nutria


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net