BookImaginaryBeings

Pedro Jorge Romero · 17 Apr 1998, 06:24 · from urth-v0009.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Pedro Jorge Romero <bempjr at redkbs.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) BookImaginaryBeings
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:24:04 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0009-0748 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0009/0748.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

> I have never read TBOIB in Spanish (that is to say, ELDLSI, "El libro
> de los seres imaginarios"), but I have seen incredible differences in
> a few English language editions.  I don't know which English language
> edition would be considered the best--I only know first hand how much
> some of them differ.  (Borges was fluent in English, at least
> conversationally, if I remember correctly?  Wolfe wrote a poem and an
> essay talking about how frustrated he felt for Borges who was visiting
> the US and had to deal with Americans practicing their high school
> Spanish upon him when he [Borges] was speaking to them in English.)

There should be an edition co-translated by Borges and Norman Thomas
Di'Giovanni (I am not sure of this name). That was considered the
canonical English language edition.

> For example, my 1987 edition (Penguin paperback "Revised, enlarged and
> translated by Norman Thomas di Giovanni in collaboration with the
> author (1969)"; reprinted with revisions 1974; reprinted 1980, 1984,
> 1987) has some charm, it also has some hideous typos that seem to have
> come from primitive optical scanning output which was never proof read
> by human eyes.

That one. The Spanish original is full of tipos too.

> Like this case, from the entry under "The Monster Acheron":
>=20
> "!n [sic] the tenth book of the _Odyssey_ . . . "
>=20
> It is difficult for me to imagine a copy editor who would mistake "!"
> for "I" . . .
>=20
> Some editions gloss the ancient authors in modern English; others
> maintain (or fabricate?) an ancient patina, like this gem regarding
> the Crocotta:
>=20
> "Pliny writes (VIII, 21) that the Crocotta is an animal `ingendred
> betwixt a dog and a Wolfe [sic]'"
>=20
> Well, no--Pliny was writing in Latin, wasn't he?  So this citation,
> this gem, would seem to be from a medieval English translation.
> >From Latin to medieval English to modern Spanish, then back to
> medieval English again?!
>=20
> Then again, all this textual variation seems so very "Borgesian" in
> itself!

Most of those things with translations are supposed to be done on
purpose. And I know that in the translation they went back to the
sources it that was in English.

Best

Pedro Jorge

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net