C????????? F??????????
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 17 Jan 2003, 22:40
· from urth-v0301.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com> Subject: RE: (urth) C????????? F?????????? Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:40:54 -0700 Message-ID: <urth-v0301-2689 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0301/2689.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The point is, you can, just about, write CF and not be Christian. By that logic, it shouldn't be Catholic either, in that you can write it and not be a Catholic. (Besides, I don't think anyone can really _be_ a Christian ... it's an ideal to attain to. Which is sufficient answer to the question of why some "Christians" behave so badly.)) > Catholicism is deeply connected with Cosmology and physics. >=3D20 > And ANTI-Catholicism is even more deeply connected - modern=3D20 > cosmology grew out of Catholic theology by opposition and > binary fission. Galileo etc. A somewhat overblown story, but point taken ... Certainly Catholicism is very deeply connected etc. Someone once told me that you can't be a Catholic and not believe in the literal seven-day creation; I said, "Oh, then I guess the last half-dozen Popes haven't been Catholics..." > A CASE OF CONSCIENCE would squeak in. So would BLACK=3D20 > EASTER, which was, of course, dedicated to CSL. H'mmm. BE/DAJ don't disguise the demons behind stfnal conceits. If you allow such things, then the word "mythopoeic" sounds better and better to me. > Blish was an agnostic BUT he was fascinated by the=3D20 > existential questions Christianity (and espescially=3D20 > Catholicism) has grappled with for so long. I believe he converted to the C of E late in life. > Did I ever tell you of the time I went to look for Lewis'=3D20 > grave in the Oxford churchyard he was buried in, and found Blish's? No! I went looking for Lewis' grave also, and got there too late - the gates were locked, and I was leaving England next day so couldn't come back. I didn't know Blish was buried=3D20 there also; now I _must_ go back. --Blattid --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net