Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Small g, Big G

ArchD'Ikon Zibethicus · 19 Jan 2003, 06:33 · from urth-v0301.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "ArchD'Ikon Zibethicus" <zibethicus at hotmail.com>
Subject: (urth) Small g, Big G
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 06:33:21 +0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0301-2697 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0301/2697.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nigel thus:

>Williams is such a wonderful but odd writer, isn't he? I confess to an
>intense love-hate relationship with his books.

Mystical, baffing and worth re-reading...

>If I may make so bold about such a complex and mystical book, can I=20
> >suggest that the primary thing going on in "The Place of the Lion" is=20
> >that the archetype of each of the nine orders of angels is let loose >in=20
>the world.

(bows) This is a much better way of describing it...my only excuse, which i=
s=20
not a valid one, is that I was writing under conditions of some haste and=20
lamentable fatigue.

>Remember that the heroine's thesis in "The Place of the Lion" is - if >my
>memory serves me - on "Neoplatonism in the Court of Charlemagne".=20
> >Archetypes were Platonic and then Neoplatonic commonplaces long before=20
> >Jung reapplied the idea of psychology.

...mmm...that's right...I'll havta re-read it...(sighs, slings it on top of=20
the 'Urgent Reading' pile...)

>Which is not to say that that idea may not also be present in >Williams,=20
>but I really don't believe that it's primary.

To be sure!  I should know better than to post in haste (post-haste?) on=20
_this_ list!  Nothwithstanding this, I think that my point about retaining =
a=20
cautious distinction between theological and fictional intentions is still,=20
possibly, a partially valid one.

>consider how much he may too have
>been playing with similar ideas to Williams. Interesting to see that he
>explicitly mentions reading Charles Williams in the interview which he >di=
d=20
>with Nutria.

Hmmmm...that's right...

->Zx<-
____________________________________________________________

Consciousness will always be one degree above comprehensibility.

- G.C.H. Ehrensvard
____________________________________________________________

Weep at least once to see God.

- Sri Ramakrishna




_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months=20
http://join.msn.com/?page=3Ddept/dialup


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net