Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Small g, Big G

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 20 Jan 2003, 17:06 · from urth-v0301.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) Small g, Big G
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:06:34 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0301-2712 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0301/2712.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> >Williams is such a wonderful but odd writer, isn't he? I=3D20
> confess to an=3D20
> >intense love-hate relationship with his books.

> Mystical, baffing and worth re-reading...

For those who do like CW, may I recommend (if you do not
already know his work) Tim Powers? The closest living writer
to "carrying on the Williams tradition," except that he is,
in my humble, a better prose stylist than Williams ever=3D20
managed to be. Williams was a fine poet, but in the writing
of fiction ... I wish I knew who first said it, but I've
always agreed with this: "He wrote potboilers, but he=3D20
always boiled an honest pot."=3D20

Anywho, Powers is an astonishing writer ...


--Blattid


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net