Urth Net

← back to the conversation

DOORS: Green's intelligence

Adam Stephanides · 26 Jan 2003, 15:11 · from urth-v0301.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) DOORS: Green's intelligence
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 09:11:56 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0301-2822 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0301/2822.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

on 1/21/03 11:18 AM, Michael Andre-Driussi at mantis at siriusfiction.com
wrote:

> Adam Stephanides wrote:
>> I have to admit, when I last read TAD (several years ago, at least) it n=
ever
>> struck me that Green was lacking in intelligence (or courage, or
>> enterprise).  And rereading the confrontation scene with Lara (chap. 31),
>> Green seems no less intelligent than Wolfe's other protagonists.
>>=20
>> Actually, now that I think about it, Wolfe's main male characters in his
>> novels written after TBOTNS all seem to me to be more or less the same
>> person, except for Horn in OBW (and possibly Latro in the Soldier books,=
 my
>> memory of which is sketchy).
>=20
> Respectfully I disagree.
[snip]

I'm not quite sure what you're disagreeing with.  But if it was the
assertion in my final paragraph, I probably expressed myself more strongly
than I'd meant to.  I didn't intend to say that the protagonists were
identical in all, or even most, respects.  What I meant was that they all
seem to me to be the same basic personality type: what I think of as
"idealized middle American male" (even when they're not American).  They're
not intellectuals, but they know how things work, and how to do things,
without boasting about it.  They have a tendency to despondency, but are
otherwise psychologically "normal" (unlike, say, the various protagonists of
5HC).  And they're fundamentally decent, without being priggish.

--Adam


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net