Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Myth and Science

James Wynn · 14 Feb 2003, 21:07 · from urth-v0302.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "James Wynn" <crushtv at HotPOP.com>
Subject: (urth) Myth and Science
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:07:59 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0302-2939 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0302/2939.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nutria proffered:
> Conventional SF works in terms of theories about the
> universe that are just that: theories. Better: myths.

Blattid deferred:
H'mmm. I don't know if I'd go so far as to call the theories
of modern science "myths."

Crush butts in:
One definition of "myth" certainly could equate the "old stories" with
scientific theory; that is, "what might have happed based on what we know."

You probably remember that this is the definition C.S. Lewis utilized (and
he was no Fundamentalist).  Consider that the interests of the old stories,
modern religion, and the sort of science that usually provokes general
interest are the same:
Where did we come from? (Prometheus, Genesis, and paleontology)
What is going on? (The Fates, the Gospels, Relativity)
Where are we going? (Ragnarok, Revelation, cosmology)

The reason is that they are born from the same visceral urges. The old
stories and religion (especially true for Judaism and Christianity) even
have an advantage in these inquiries that science does not. That is, all
three presume that the human point-of-view is valid and objectively true,
but only the first two can begin to justify why.

Finally, this definition explains the ubiquitous interest of SF writers
(like Wolfe) in ancient mythology.

--- Crush




--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net