Uther Uthers

Timothy Reilly · 15 Apr 2003, 23:37 · from urth-v0304.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Timothy Reilly" <treilly at ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: (urth) Uther Uthers
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:37:55 +1000
Message-ID: <urth-v0304-3185 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0304/3185.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

alga wrote:

>And I don't think Wolfe is a very good short story >writer, by and large.
Some of his fables are marvelous in >-Just-So- kind of way, and a few of the
longer stories, >novellas really, are very good. But if you're pinching
>pennies, skipping a Wolfe collection is not unwise.

I entirely agree, and am surprised I can't recall this point having been
made before on this list.  Wolfe obviously likes writing short stories, but
I don't think he's particularly good at it.  And it's not because I don't
like short stories - I think Chekhov is marvellous.  But I can't think of a
single Wolfe short story that is truly impressive (except perhaps the
Detective of Dreams, but even then...).  His novellas and novels are a
different matter of course!

Tim

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net