Moorcock

Roy C. Lackey · 19 Apr 2003, 04:04 · from urth-v0304.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Moorcock
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 23:04:49 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0304-3236 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0304/3236.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan'l quoted and wrote:
>>Mike would be deeply insulted to be compared in any way to Heinlein,
>
>That's a pity, because to refuse such comparison is essentially to
>insist on situating himself outside the SF/F genre entirely; RAH is,
>so to speak, the elephant in the room. Like every SF/F writer from
>the 1950s on, Moorcock uses (consciously or not) rhetorical techniques
>and moves invented or improved by Heinlein to establish the nature of
>his discursive pseudo-realities.

Amen! I don't think I've ever been so entirely in agreement with Dan'l about
anything so much as his eloquent defense of a man who shouldn't need
defending.

Perhaps the most conspicuous instance of Heinlein in Wolfe is "The Last
Thrilling Wonder Story". From my first reading of it to today, I have always
thought that Wolfe was making some sort of dig at Heinlein -- putting him
down in some way -- that I've never been comfortable with. Maybe it's just
me.

-Roy

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net