Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Generic considerations revisited

James Jordan · 25 Apr 2003, 20:36 · from urth-v0304.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Generic considerations revisited
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:36:16 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0304-3327 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0304/3327.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


>Nutria:
>
>>A difference between a fictive universe that the author intends=20
>>to >correspond to the real world, and a fictive universe that=20
>>introduces >things that are not at present in the real world

 From the Archdeacon:

>I suspect that all literature is the consequence of a process of selection=20
>and elimination - at story is told which does not and cannot correspond to=20
>any 'real' events which may be their basis.
>
>This, firstly, because 'real' life is distinctly plotless and, frequently,=20
>motiveless, and, secondly, because 'real' life cannot be narrated in its -=20
>oh, say its 'raw' form - for exactly that reason.

         I'd say so. Art abstracts from life in order to enhance and/or=20
analyze-discuss some aspect of life. True of all art. I think that's what=20
Blattid is getting at with his subjective/objective schema: What is it that=20
is primarily being abstracted from life and being analyzed in some way?
         I would ask: What is the aspect of life that is unique to SF that=20
is somehow present in SF works and not in others? It would seem to be=20
speculations of some sort about or involving science and technology that=20
does not presently "exist" in our present world. Such speculations can be=20
merely present and not the main thing, an SF element in what Blattid would=20
put as MF; or they can be the overriding factor, in what Blattid would=20
consider SF.
         I don't know if this advances the discussion any. It's fun, though.

Nutria



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net