Reading Order

Steve Strickland · 27 Apr 2003, 16:27 · from urth-v0304.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Steve Strickland" <sstrickland at satx.rr.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Reading Order
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:27:50 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0304-3339 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0304/3339.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oren,

There's no need to read New Sun first.  I think Short Sun would be terribly
difficult and not nearly as satisfying if you hadn't read Long Sun first.
Just one man's opinion.

Steve Strickland

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Oren Douek" <orend at axelero.hu>
To: <urth at urth.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 9:37 AM
Subject: (urth) Reading Order


> I have a quick question. Would it be terrible if I read the Short Sun
> sequence after finishing the New Sun one? Or must I read the Long Sun in
> between?
>
> Thanks, Oren
>
>
> --=20


--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net