Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Reading Order

Gareth Jelley · 27 Apr 2003, 16:22 · from urth-v0304.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Gareth Jelley" <gjelley at btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Reading Order
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:22:12 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0304-3340 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0304/3340.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From: "Oren Douek" <orend at axelero.hu>

> I have a quick question. Would it be terrible if I read the Short Sun
> sequence after finishing the New Sun one? Or must I read the Long Sun in
> between?


Personally, I wouldn't worry, as reading the books in an order different to
the published order could shed light on different issues, because you'd be
coming at it from a different angle. I'm reading the Short Sun books first,
and then I plan to read either the New Sun or the Long Sun books. So I'd go
with whatever your mood is, as, if nothing else, it will mean that you
'read' the Wolfe-Urth-universe in a personal - and perhaps quite fruitfully
non-linear - way.

My two cents :o)

Best,

G.


--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net