Cross and Unicorn

James Jordan · 09 Jul 2003, 13:58 · from urth-v0307.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Cross and Unicorn
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 08:58:02 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3603 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3603.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Seems right to me. I was commenting on possibly why Wolfe would pick these=20
two, and call the second "unicorn."

Markus Nutricious Latro

At 05:23 AM 7/9/2003, James Wynn wrote:
>There is at least agreement that these constellations are Crux and
>Monoceros, right?
>
>Crush
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "James Jordan" <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
>To: <urth at urth.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:19 PM
>Subject: (urth) Cross and Unicorn
>
>
> > I'd take it as Christ and the Church, since the Unicorn is associated w=
ith
> > virgin women.
> >
> > Nutria
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
>
>--



--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net