Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Sev's not-so-perfect memory

James Jordan · 13 Jul 2003, 21:41 · from urth-v0307.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at cox.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Sev's not-so-perfect memory
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:41:57 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3667 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3667.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 02:31 AM 7/13/2003, you wrote:
>Josh says:
>
> > In a fifteen hundred page book?
> >
> > Without a computer?
> >
> > No one, as far as I know, is arguing that Gene Wolfe has a perfect
> > memory.
>
>FWIW, I agree with Josh. Roy's list of errors are easily explained as Wolfe
>nodding, IMO. Go through any series of large books by anybody, and you'll
>probably find the same. I'm reading Trollope at the moment - a similar
>effort for his body of work would probably fill a volume the size of one of
>his big, fat novels.

         BUT, Trollope wrote for serialized publication. The first part of=20
a given book or series was in magazine print before the later parts were=20
even written, as I understand it. Wolfe worked over the New Sun books FOUR=20
times before initial publication. I can tell you that I myself check=20
earlier chapters  more than once for consistency while I write, and go over=20
my whole book more than once after it is all finished. I don't write=20
fiction but Bible commentary (fiction to some, here, I suppose!), and when=20
I find something "new" to talk about in chapter 10 of, say Daniel, I make=20
sure what I wrote about chapters 1-9 is consistent with it. I think we=20
should assume that usually the errors are deliberate and ask IF they really=20
ARE errors (my previous post), and if so, what they might mean.

Nutria




>--



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net