Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Malrubius/silk

maa32 · 18 Jul 2003, 16:16 · from urth-v0307.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: maa32 <maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu>
Subject: (urth) Malrubius/silk
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:16:34 -0700
Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3691 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3691.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My problem with regarding Malrubius' eidolon as Silk throughout BotNS is th=
e=20
explicit rationale for Malrubius and his presence with Triskele.  Does=20
Malrubius' advice seem like something that Silk would spout?  Silk is a bit=20
more of a preacher type with a devout message ... and that would mean that =
the=20
hierodules who maintain the image of Malrubius would have to be discounted =
or=20
labeled as "vanished people", which they aren't.  The way that Wolfe=20
seamlessly integrated a rationale for the absence of the guard at the gate =
in=20
the opening scenes of Shadow of the Torturer leads me to believe that anyth=
ing=20
he threw in wouldn't destroy the continuity like having Silk be malrubius'=20
ghost (and the only Malrubius ghost that Severian would meet).

Unless one wants to rationalize the close kinship of Triskele with Malrubiu=
s=20
in TBotNS by stating that Silk met and hung out with Triskele in RttW, so t=
hat=20
would explain how Malrubius becomes an intimate acquiantance with the dog i=
f,=20
indeed, he was Silk instead of Malrubius.  That scheme would require some=20
severe retrofitting:

a)vanished people must be hierodules
b)Silk's astral voyages must be considered eidolon-like
c) all of the commentary about Severian's youth or his experiences that=20
Malrubius relates in TBOTNS must be considered lies or "altered"
d)  Malrubius' explanation at end of Citadel of the Autarch of what an eido=
lon=20
is cannot be strictly factual, if he is actually alive somewhen else, being=20
maintained in that universe by an artifact of the vanished people/hierodules
e)Severian must have a reason for substituting a new character for a master=20
from his past, because he has no qualms about travelers like The Green Man =
and=20
Master Ash, and identifying them by their "real identities".  If anything,=20
Silk is more believable than them.

I don't think it works, really.

Marc Aramini



--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net