Bruce Pennington covers

Tony Ellis · 06 May 1998, 08:57 · from urth-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: tony.ellis at futurenet.co.uk (Tony Ellis)
Subject: (urth) Bruce Pennington covers
Date: 6 May 1998 09:57:04 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0010-0093 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0010/0093.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

                                                                     =20
06/05/98
                                                                      09:40
 Bruce Pennington covers

Dan Parmenter wrote:
>Speaking of Don Maitz and the covers, isn't there also a series of
>covers for the British versions that are by someone else?=20

Whenever I read praise for the Maitz covers I feel this evangelical=20
urge to champion our own original British covers (not to be
confused with the various naff covers of the later reprints). Thank
you giving me the chance to preach, Dan!

The artist is Bruce Pennington, and for my money his covers=20
evoke the romance, the mystery, the great age and the ruinous
beauty of Severian's world like nothing else. The covers for=20
Claw and Shadow are the most outstanding, but they all convey -
through tone and colour as much as through what is depicted -
exactly what the reader is in for.

Dan, I'll be happy to scan the covers for you. And anyone else
who has never seen them will be doing themselves a favour if
they take a peek too.

>There's a particular segment
>of SF readership that calls itself "literary fandom" that seems to
>openly despise any SF that attempts to go much beyond space opera

Agreed. SF fans always assume the moral high ground in the great
SF versus Literature conflict, but in fact there's an awful lot of inverted
snobbery in there. And the only thing that's worse than a snob is
an inverted snob.

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net