Crowley, then ...

Tom Foster · 28 Jul 2003, 07:55 · from urth-v0307.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Tom Foster" <t.foster2 at ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley, then ...
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:55:46 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3765 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3765.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Strange; that's almost exactly how I felt when I read it a few months ago. I
had read so many good things about Crowley that I thought I really should
read some of his work. I enjoyed _Little, Big_ a lot, but it certainly
didn't grip me, nor did it fill me with the sort of wonder and awe that I
feel every time I (re-)read one of Wolfe's novels.  I recently bought
_Otherwise_, a book containing Crowley's first three novels. _The Deep_ I
absolutely loved, _Beasts_ seemed disjointed although it had some very good
ideas, and _Engine Summer_ (another book that seems to get a whole lot of
praise in these parts) produced more or less the same reaction as _Little,
Big_

I would love to read _Aegypt_ as I understand it has a strong alchemy theme
to it (a subject that fascinates me), but I can't find it anywhere for
anything resembling a reasonable price (ditto _Love & Sleep_). It would seem
a shame to read _Daemonomania_ before the preceding titles, but it's the
only one of the three that can be bought easily.

Tom

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> Okay. So, after years of seeing people on this list rave about John
> Crowley, I've read
> _Little, Big_ over the last few weeks.
>
> And I just.
>
> Don't.
>
> Get it.
>
> I don't mean the story: I was able to follow that well enough, and
> more or less
> glom onto what it's about, but ... what's the _point_?
>
> Can someone tell me what I've missed here?
>
> --Blattid

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net