Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Crowley, then ...

Craig Brewer · 28 Jul 2003, 13:57 · from urth-v0307.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley, then ...
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3768 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3768.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"Alice K. Turner" supposed:

> It is partly a sort of mood thing. a state of mind
> that people who read Victorian children's
> literature, or loved the fairy paintings of the
> period, when they were young can slip into easily,
> picking up on the many allusions that come along
> and the light literary parodies. It is partly a kind
> of 60s thing, especially among New Yorkers.

I'd have to agree with most of this and add that LB is
the kind of book that I could only enjoy now after
having read a lot of other stuff that's become more of
a literary memory than something fresh. I personally
enjoyed it because of the strains of Renaissance
philosophy (ie., Bruno and neoplatonism) that ran
through it.

I read in an interview that Crowley began LB as a kind
of a "concept book," intending to just write a book
about a family with their own private religion. And
the fairy stuff began as just a way to make that
private religion more accessible to readers. But then
the fairy motifs took over. In the same interview (I
think), Crowley admitted that it was a book which
didn't have the same universal scope as he tried to
get in his Aegypt series - it was something that was
more of a playing out of a minor personal obsession.

The real reason I so love that book, though, is that
as a kid I was always hunting for fairy hills and
circle dances...which I always felt were just around
the corner. And if the end of that book is any
indication, I may have been right...

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

--=20




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net