Crowley, then ...
Josh Geller · 29 Jul 2003, 16:47
· from urth-v0307.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Josh Geller <brunians at brunians.org> Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley, then ... Date: 29 Jul 2003 09:47:03 -0700 Message-ID: <urth-v0307-3819 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3819.txt.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:08, James Jordan wrote: > Josh wrote: >> Did you like 'The Deep'? > Yes, I did. It's about my favorite J Crowley, mostly. > Then, thou hast responded to severall things I wrote. Let me say=20 > that I was giving my PERSONAL reaction to LB. And my initial one. alga an= d=20 > others set me straight about some things. Very good.=20 > I really was not sure about LB, and that's what initiated the lo= ng=20 > discussion that can be read in the archives, and what I was getting at in=20 > my post. I sure don't want to open up another discussion of LB. I think i= t=20 > was pretty thoroughly gone over a few years ago. I will check out the archives.=20 Meanwhile, I would like to respect your desire not to open another discussion about 'Little, Big', and so I will not respond to your points below. Perhaps after I have read the archives I will have something to ask you or someone else, but not now. Thank you for being so gracious. J. ___ --=20
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net