Crowley

Alice K. Turner · 01 Aug 2003, 07:07 · from urth-v0308.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice K. Turner" <aturner6 at nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Crowley
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 03:07:35 -0400
Message-ID: <urth-v0308-3839 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0308/3839.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

bee,

>>Little, Big can be especially bewildering if
>>you are not familiar with the symbolic devices
>>he develops in his earlier novels.

Hmm. By this time I suppose I'm pretty conversant with Crowley but I don'=
=3D
t
know what you mean by this. LB does not seem to me to pick up on themes f=
=3D
rom
his three earlier books, other than details like cards and games. Not do
they seem to have a lot in common. What am I missing here?

Going back through our correspondence, the only other (possibly) relevant
thing I said was

>>Although Crowley is certainly intrigued,
>>if not obsessed, with occult matters
(you urthlings have convinced me that Gnostic
themes in particular are explored in his novels),
>>I find it hard to pinpoint
>>where his actual sympathies lie. Smoky, like
>>the protagonist of the =3DC6gypt series, frequently
>>encounters strange goings-on--even falls in love
>>with a semi-fantastic creature or two--but never
>>really buys into the whole supernatural mindset.
>>I suspect that one of the reasons Crowley mines
>>the occult so heavily is because it is such a
>>convenient metaphor for fiction in general. If
>>there is a single dominant theme in Crowley's
>>work it is the creation and perpetuation of
>>stories. Crowley may believe in certain things
>>that others consider fiction; he may not. I dunno.

Crowley emphatically does not. So he says with considerable vigor in the
interview printed both in mantis's chapbook and in the
booklength -Snake's-hands- and also, slightly differently, in Locus of 20=
=3D
01
or so. But you are correct that he finds it a useful and even beautiful
metaphor.

-alga

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net