Typhon's folly?

James Wynn · 09 Sep 2003, 15:45 · from urth-v0309.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "James Wynn" <crushtv at hotpop.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Typhon's folly?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:45:48 -0500
Message-ID: <urth-v0309-4084 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0309/4084.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matthew says:
> Roy suggests that Typhon's tampering might have done the damage - the
> means emplyoyed to draw off energy rather than the amount of energay
> actually utilised.
....
> Scientifically it's nonsense yet plausible with a vigorous enough wand.
...
> As a narrative I like the concept.  Within Wolfe's Urth I'd find it akward
> because it implies a technological sophistication that I don't believe
> Typhon had.

Well, the concept fits thematically with Typhon's name and identification
with Set and all the other serpents that devoured the Sun during an eclipse.
So naturally the concept is attractive to me.

Once one presumes the technology to implant a black hole into a star, all
bets are off for plausibility. It doesn't have to mean sending a beam of
"energy" to where you want it ~ it could be some other method as
inconceivable to us as power lines would be to someone in the 17th century.

Propulsion/Mirror technology and Energy technology are not necessarily the
same thing. There is no need to believe that because Typhon did not have
access to one, that he did not have access to the other. Typhon himself
didn't seem to understand how this technology worked precisely himself.

The ancient Sumerians invented algebra, but never figured out papyrus or
advanced metallurgy. The Greeks made startling advances in astronomy
(discovering heliocentricy, the Earth's spherical shape, and methods for
measuring the distance to the moon and the circumference of the Earth) but
never developed a scientific method.

It's possibly due to my naivet=C3=A9 in practical science, but it never str=
uck me
as awkward.

Crush

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net