Urth Net

← back to the conversation

BotNS in German

Lisa Schaffer-Doggett · 06 Dec 2004, 08:09 · from 2004-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: harlekin at earthlink.net (Lisa Schaffer-Doggett)
Date: Mon Dec  6 08:09:55 2004
Subject: (urth) BotNS in German
In-Reply-To: <00da01c4db7c$5369b240$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Message-ID: <82FFF5CF-47A9-11D9-ABDD-0003939CE29C at earthlink.net>

Not allowing a language to change is the surest way to make it 
irrelevant.  That's why all the moaning about the death of the english 
language makes me laugh.  IMO it's as vital a language as ever because 
it's mutable.  An obsession with words is like loving a dress more than 
the woman it adorns.  Fortunately for us, Wolfe loves the woman AND has 
exceptional taste in dresses.(this metaphor of course is gender 
reversible) As far as German and English, they are closely related in 
both vocabulary and in sentence structure, closer than english is to 
any romance language.  With a little digging I think a good translation 
would be doable.  Where there are latin, greek, and hebrew words, just 
use them as is.  The equivalents to obscure english words should be 
easily available, (as in the barbican example).  Getting the right feel 
might be hard, since German is such a straightforward language, and 
Wolfe is anything and everything but.  Then, if it was easy, someone 
probably would have done it by now, huh?

Don

On Monday, December 6, 2004, at 02:14 AM, James Wynn wrote:

> Regarding the problems in translating Wolfe in to other languages, is 
> it the
> case that French and Germans *do not* borrow from other languages? I
> understand that the French have a governmental standards board the
> determines whether words are "French" or not but does this prohibit 
> French
> or Germans from using them in literature?
>
> I ask this because in "Castle of the Otter/Days" Wolfe compares his 
> use of
> obscure words to the use of science fictiony made-up words. Would there
> really be a problem with using a word like "barbicon" if no exact such 
> word
> existed in German?
>
> ~ Crush
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net