the problem with gaiman, mieville, and pullman
Charles Reed · 06 Dec 2004, 11:23
· from 2004-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: cmreed at link.com (Charles Reed) Date: Mon Dec 6 11:23:44 2004 Subject: (urth) the problem with gaiman, mieville, and pullman In-Reply-To: <1f76173704112911553b53139c at mail.gmail.com> References: <20041129093730.4835B37CE9 at sitemail.everyone.net> <1f76173704112911553b53139c at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <41B4B1C8.5010200 at link.com> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: ><snip> > > >>Someone mentioned earlier that it has become a fashion lately >>to attack Lewis's work. >> >> > >That would be me. I've seen it all over the place but especially in >the "Gaiman generation." > > > >>Despite my own problems with Lewis's particular worldview, I have read >>essay by Neil Gaiman, China Mieville, and Phillip Pullman which were >>written basically to "debunk" Lewiss and for Mieville Tolkien as well. >> >> > >I would very much like a pointer to Gaiman's essay, as up to now I >have only his fictions to base this on. (Not only "The Problem of >Susan," but also the _Sandman_ arc "A Game of You," which has >some details that have always seemed to me to be idle passing >swipes at the Narnia books.) > It had been quite a while since I last read A GAME OF YOU, but I couldn't recall any "swipes" at the Narnia books, so I took the opportunity to re-read it, and still couldn't find anything I would call classify as being derogatory toward Narnia. Do you recall anything specific that made you think so? There are some obvious Narnia references (as well as plenty Oz and Middle-Earth references), with the most obvious being the sequence toward the end where Barbie's dream world comes to an end. This is very much an echo of Narnia's end in THE LAST BATTLE, but I couldn't detect any Narnia references in the writing that would not be considered an homage. I did a little googling on the web, and came across a speech that Gaiman gave at Mythcon 35 (the Mythopoeic Society's big shindig) in 2004, in which he says some very complimentary things regarding C. S. Lewis. I hope I'm not violating any copyright by quoting the entire Narnia passage: ------------------------------ I was six years old when I saw an episode of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe in black and white on television at my grandmother's house in Portsmouth. I remember the beavers, and the first appearance of Aslan, an actor in an unconvincing lion costume, standing on his hind legs, from which I deduce that this was probably episode two or three. I went home to Sussex and saved my meagre pocket money until I was able to buy a copy of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe of my own. I read it, and The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, the other book I could find, over and over, and when my seventh birthday arrived I had dropped enough hints that my birthday present was a boxed set of the complete Narnia books. And I remember what I did on my seventh birthday -- I lay on my bed and I read the books all through, from the first to the last. For the next four or five years I continued to read them. I would read other books, of course, but in my heart I knew that I read them only because there wasn't an infinite number of Narnia books to read. For good or ill the religious allegory, such as it was, went entirely over my head, and it was not until I was about twelve that I found myself realising that there were Certain Parallels. Most people get it at the Stone Table; I got it when it suddenly occurred to me that the story of the events that occurred to Saint Paul on the road to Damascus was the dragoning of Eustace Scrubb all over again. I was personally offended: I felt that an author, whom I had trusted, had had a hidden agenda. I had nothing against religion, or religion in fiction -- I had bought (in the school bookshop) and loved The Screwtape Letters, and was already dedicated to G.K. Chesterton. My upset was, I think, that it made less of Narnia for me, it made it less interesting a thing, less interesting a place. Still, the lessons of Narnia sank deep. Aslan telling the Tash worshippers that the prayers he had given to Tash were actually prayers to Him was something I believed then, and ultimately still believe. The Pauline Baynes map of Narnia poster stayed up on my bedroom wall through my teenage years. I didn't return to Narnia until I was a parent, first in 1988, then in 1999, each time reading all the books aloud to my children. I found that the things that I loved, I still loved -- sometimes loved more -- while the things that I had thought odd as a child (the awkwardness of the structure of Prince Caspian, and my dislike for most of The Last Battle, for example) had intensified; there were also some new things that made me really uncomfortable -- for example the role of women in the Narnia books, culminating in the disposition of Susan. But what I found more interesting was how much of the Narnia books had crept inside me: as I would write there would be moment after moment of realising that I'd borrowed phrases, rhythms, the way that words were put together; for example, that I had a hedgehog and a hare, in The Books of Magic, speaking and agreeing with each other much as the Dufflepuds do. C.S. Lewis was the first person to make me want to be a writer. He made me aware of the writer, that there was someone standing behind the words, that there was someone telling the story. I fell in love with the way he used parentheses -- the auctorial asides that were both wise and chatty, and I rejoiced in using such brackets in my own essays and compositions through the rest of my childhood. I think, perhaps, the genius of Lewis was that he made a world that was more real to me than the one I lived in; and if authors got to write the tales of Narnia, then I wanted to be an author. ------------------------------ The rest of the speech is worth reading (mainly about Tolkien and Chesterton), so if you want to read the entire speech, here's the link: http://www.mythsoc.org/gaiman.htm Charles
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net