urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19

Iorwerth Thomas · 11 Dec 2004, 11:03 · from 2004-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: iorweththomas at hotmail.com (Iorwerth Thomas)
Date: Sat Dec 11 11:03:06 2004
Subject: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19
In-Reply-To: <1f761737041210110115001658 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BAY102-F24D4683194888E528660C6B9A90 at phx.gbl>

Fair enough.  Same probably goes for third world Protestants - I should have 
ended thaat statement with an 'in my rather limited' experience.  Mea culpa.

Iorwerth

>From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>,The Urth Mailing List 
><urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
>To: The Urth Mailing List <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
>Subject: Re: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19
>Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:01:43 -0800
>
>Iorweth,
>
>Third-world Catholics are frequently Creationists.
>
>
>On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:16:57 +0000, Iorwerth Thomas
><iorweththomas at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oops, sorry if that came across a bit snarky; haven't been getting 
>enough
> > sleep recently.
> >
> > And in the interests of interdenominational harmony, I can't think of 
>ANY
> > Creationist Catholics.
> >
> > Iorwerth
> > >From: "Iorwerth Thomas" <iorweththomas at hotmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: The Urth Mailing List <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
> > >To: urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net
> > >Subject: Re: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19
> > >Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:05:41 +0000
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Notice the Catholics accepted evolution and thermodynamics while the
> > >>Protestants do not, besides the fact Catholics don't deracinate
> > >>Christianity
> > >
> > >That should probably be modified to _some_ (perhaps a minority)
> > >Protestants, as myself and the Reverend Professor John Polkinghorne 
>would
> > >be in deep trouble if, as scientists, we believed in neither evolution 
>nor
> > >thermodynamics.
> > >
> > >In fact, apart from  Ian Paisley, I can't actually think of any
> > >high-profile Creationist Protestants in the UK; it's more of a US 
>thing.
> > >
> > >Iorwerth Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Urth Mailing List
> > >To post, write urth at urth.net
> > >Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Urth Mailing List
> > To post, write urth at urth.net
> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> >
>
>
>--
>www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
>Freedom has no barcode.
>      --J.G. Ballard
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net