urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19
Iorwerth Thomas · 11 Dec 2004, 11:33
· from 2004-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: iorweththomas at hotmail.com (Iorwerth Thomas) Date: Sat Dec 11 11:33:09 2004 Subject: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19 In-Reply-To: <00ad01c4deea$81d6fb80$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: <BAY102-F14933327AE6847482EFA4CB9A90 at phx.gbl> > >I'm sure I could find some easily among the nuns a many a parochial school >(increasingly easily depending on the definition of "Creationist"). On reflection, the same is probably true of many an Anglican Sunday school teacher... >I don't >consider this a put down (although I recognize that many think it is, >Catholic or not). I know many educated intelligent Creationists of various >stripes. > A friend of mine was (and is, as far as I'm aware) a Creationist Mormon - and he was one of the best educated and intelligent people I've met. I still think that he's wrong, though :) (And he was prepared to admit that the evidence was against him, which is fair enough.) But there's no logical link between being a Creationist and being stupid; it may just be difficult to be one and an evolutionary biologist... I think that what originally got my goat was the suggestion that attempting to harmonise one's scientific and religous beliefs was not something that Protestants did, which is false - it also appeared to iilegitamately generalise over all the thousands of Protestant groups, which is a bit risky, since as well as Creationists, these various denominations and schools of thought include Anglicans (who don't agree on anything [1]) and liberal Protestant process philosophers (eg. David Ray Griffin), for whom evolutionary thought is an important part of their theology. Iorwerth [1] This is an empirical observation made by myself, as an Anglican.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net