Urth Net

← back to the conversation

urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19

Iorwerth Thomas · 11 Dec 2004, 11:33 · from 2004-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: iorweththomas at hotmail.com (Iorwerth Thomas)
Date: Sat Dec 11 11:33:09 2004
Subject: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 4, Issue 19
In-Reply-To: <00ad01c4deea$81d6fb80$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Message-ID: <BAY102-F14933327AE6847482EFA4CB9A90 at phx.gbl>



>
>I'm sure I could find some easily among the nuns a many a parochial school
>(increasingly easily depending on the definition of "Creationist").

On reflection, the same is probably true of many an Anglican Sunday school 
teacher...

>I don't
>consider this a put down (although I recognize that many think it is,
>Catholic or not). I know many educated intelligent Creationists of various
>stripes.
>

A friend of mine was (and is, as far as I'm aware) a Creationist Mormon - 
and he was one of the best educated and intelligent people I've met.  I 
still think that he's wrong, though :)  (And he was prepared to admit that 
the evidence was against him, which is fair enough.)  But there's no logical 
link between being a Creationist and being stupid; it may just be difficult 
to be one and an evolutionary biologist...

I think that what originally got my goat was the suggestion that attempting 
to harmonise one's scientific and religous beliefs was not something that 
Protestants did, which is false - it also appeared to iilegitamately 
generalise over all the thousands of Protestant groups, which is a bit 
risky, since as well as Creationists, these various denominations and 
schools of thought include Anglicans (who don't agree on anything [1]) and 
liberal Protestant process philosophers (eg. David Ray Griffin), for whom 
evolutionary thought is an important part of their theology.

Iorwerth

[1]  This is an empirical observation made by myself, as an Anglican.


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net