Orwell on Chesterton

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 11 Jan 2005, 10:58 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Tue Jan 11 10:58:01 2005
Subject: (urth) Orwell on Chesterton
In-Reply-To: <20050111184153.99593.qmail at web53510.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050111184153.99593.qmail at web53510.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1f76173705011110571de36a2f at mail.gmail.com>

Aqala:

I am a great admirer of both Orwell and Chesterton, and a
man who is converting to Catholicism in his 40s, after a
great deal (more than ten years) of thought.May I ask why
you feel it necessary to post something so inflammatorially
insulting?

--Dan'l 


On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:41:52 -0800 (PST), aqala at yahoo.com
<aqala at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think some of this list's subscribers will benefit from reading George
> Orwell's opinion of G. K. Chesterton:
> 
> -------------------quote-------------------
> ...political Catholicism. Its most outstanding exponent?though he was
> perhaps an extreme case rather than a typical one?was G. K. Chesterton.
> Chesterton was a writer of considerable talent who whose to suppress both
> his sensibilities and his intellectual honesty in the cause of Roman
> Catholic propaganda. During the last twenty years or so of his life, his
> entire output was in reality an endless repetition of the same thing,
> under its laboured cleverness as simple and boring as 'Great is Diana of
> the Ephesians.' Every book that he wrote, every scrap of dialogue, had to
> demonstrate beyond the possibility of mistake the superiority of the
> Catholic over the Protestant or the pagan. But Chesterton was not content
> to think of this superiority as merely intellectual or spiritual: it had
> to be translated into terms of national prestige and military power, which
> entailed an ignorant idealisation of the Latin countries, especially
> France.  Chesterton had not lived long in France, and his picture of it?as
> a land of Catholic peasants incessantly singing the MARSEILLAISE over
> glasses of red wine?had about as much relation to reality as CHU CHIN CHOW
> has to everyday life in Baghdad. And with this went not only an enormous
> overestimation of French military power (both before and after 1914-18 he
> maintained that France, by itself, was stronger than Germany), but a silly
> and vulgar glorification of the actual process of war.  Chesterton's
> battle poems, such as Lepanto or The Ballad of Saint Barbara, make The
> Charge of the Light Brigade read like a pacifist tract: they are perhaps
> the most tawdry bits of bombast to be found in our language. The
> interesting thing is that had the romantic rubbish which he habitually
> wrote about France and the French army been written by somebody else about
> Britain and the British army, he would have been the first to jeer. In
> home politics he was a Little Englander, a true hater of jingoism and
> imperialism, and according to his lights a true friend of democracy. Yet
> when he looked outwards into the international field, he could forsake his
> principles without even noticing he was doing so. Thus, his almost
> mystical belief in the virtues of democracy did not prevent him from
> admiring Mussolini. Mussolini had destroyed the representative government
> and the freedom of the press for which Chesterton had struggled so hard at
> home, but Mussolini was an Italian and had made Italy strong, and that
> settled the matter. Nor did Chesterton ever find a word to say about
> imperialism and the conquest of coloured races when they were practised by
> Italians or Frenchmen. His hold on reality, his literary taste, and even
> to some extent his moral sense, were dislocated as soon as his
> nationalistic [Nationalism as defined by GO and not the standard meaning]
> loyalties were involved.
> 
> [From NOTES ON NATIONALISM (1945)]
> -------------------quote-------------------
> 
> My own opinion of Chesterton is much shorter:
> A man so lacking in thought and intellect he converted to Catholicism when
> in his 40's.
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
> http://my.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 


-- 
www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
Freedom has no barcode.
     --J.G. Ballard

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net