Ending of The Knight

Gregg · 11 Jan 2005, 15:39 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gwbest328 at RCN.COM (Gregg)
Date: Tue Jan 11 15:39:48 2005
Subject: (urth) Ending of The Knight
In-Reply-To: <20050111200903.04700985A5 at che.dreamhost.com>
Message-ID: <002401c4f836$d8948130$55fcaccf@GWB>

>Message: 9
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:05:05 -0500
>From: "James Wynn" <thewynns at earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: (urth) Ending of The Knight
>To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
>Message-ID: <00d601c4f818$d8d4e130$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

>The Wizard Knight series?  I consider this a single novel that is meant to
>be read that way. In a couple years it will no doubt be offered that way.
>Unlike the Latro books, I don't consider it a "series". Does anyone
>disagree with that? Does anyone think the books were intended to be
>ultimately read as self-standing novels?

Mr. Wolfe said at Windycon this past year that he considers The Wizard
Knight to be two books, but he conceded that "everyone else" considers it to
be one book. Another case of his intentions being misunderstood, it would
seem.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net