Urth Net

← back to the conversation

silver glass

aramini1 at cox.net · 11 Jan 2005, 17:22 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: aramini1 at cox.net (aramini1 at cox.net)
Date: Tue Jan 11 17:22:03 2005
Subject: (urth) silver glass
Message-ID: <20050112012201.EJUJ7026.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net at smtp.west.cox.net>


The big, huge problem with getting specific instances of Silk in the third person "HE" of RTTW whorl scenes is that they weren't written by a witness - they are 3rd person - and why is that?  Unfortunately, any writing of Silk into the narrator can easily be relegated to the discretion of the editors - making it impossible to PROVE his [psychic] identity one way or the other. 

Why does the story start where it does?  Is this because Silver Silk is Horn's impetus for writing?  Is it just a matter of convenience?  Or is it because he wants to find who he is through the process of writing his story, now that he has been commingled with Silk?

Marc

> That's why asking for specific instances is so tough. But I *am* convinced
> they are there (and the quote I gave is proof enough for me).
> 
> ~ Crush
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net