Ending of The Knight

Gregg · 12 Jan 2005, 15:11 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gwbest328 at RCN.COM (Gregg)
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:11:06 2005
Subject: (urth) Ending of The Knight
In-Reply-To: <20050112050019.59133985CF at che.dreamhost.com>
Message-ID: <002001c4f8fc$01eec9d0$55fcaccf@GWB>

>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:57:31 -0500
>From: "James Wynn" <thewynns at earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: (urth) Ending of The Knight
>To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
>Message-ID: <016501c4f839$505134a0$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

>>Mr. Wolfe said at Windycon this past year that he considers The Wizard
>>Knight to be two books, but he conceded that "everyone else" considers it
>>to be one book. Another case of his intentions being misunderstood, it
>>would seem.

>Hm. Well, okay. The Knight ends rather precipitously and unsatisfactorily
>for a stand-alone and the "series" is called "The Wizard Knight" which the
>opposite of the actual order. What can I say? Should I presume "everyone
>else" includes his editor? ;-)

>~ Crush

He didn't offer a definition of who "everyone else" is to him. He didn't
seem particularly happy or unhappy that he is the only one who thinks The
Wizard Knight is two books, either. It just seemed obvious to him, but we
aren't getting it. A familiar situation for us, eh?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net