Ending of The Knight

Thomas Bitterman · 13 Jan 2005, 06:37 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: tom at bitterman.net (Thomas Bitterman)
Date: Thu Jan 13 06:37:35 2005
Subject: (urth) Ending of The Knight
In-Reply-To: <20050112232325.42323.qmail at web20026.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050112232325.42323.qmail at web20026.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <41E68797.6060603 at bitterman.net>

stilskin wrote:

> 
>--- Gregg <gwbest328 at RCN.COM> wrote:
>  
>
>>He didn't offer a definition of who "everyone else"
>>is to him. He didn't
>>seem particularly happy or unhappy that he is the
>>only one who thinks The
>>Wizard Knight is two books, either. It just seemed
>>obvious to him, but we
>>aren't getting it. A familiar situation for us, eh?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I wouldn't be so quick to accept Wolfe's statements at
>face value here (or anywhere else, for that matter). 
>  
>
I took this as a joke.  "Everyone else" thinks it's one book for 
literary reasons.
He thinks it's two books because, well, physically there are two books.

>paul
>  
>
Enamel

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net