Ending of The Knight

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 13 Jan 2005, 10:10 · from 2005-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Thu Jan 13 10:10:12 2005
Subject: (urth) Ending of The Knight
In-Reply-To: <016f01c4f96f$e54de530$3f87d2d1@VALUED7B9600FA>
References: <002401c4f836$d8948130$55fcaccf@GWB>
	<016f01c4f96f$e54de530$3f87d2d1@VALUED7B9600FA>
Message-ID: <1f76173705011310107c878393 at mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:00:44 -0500, Alan Lewis <alanarc at frontiernet.net> wrote:
> So I agree with GW on this one, even though it seems like I have little to
> no company.

Definitely not "no" - I completely agree with your reasoning and your
conclusion.

--Blattid

-- 
www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
Freedom has no barcode.
     --J.G. Ballard

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net