Compliant (sic)
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 19 Jan 2005, 08:58
· from 2005-January.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Wed Jan 19 08:58:54 2005
Subject: (urth) Compliant (sic)
In-Reply-To: <20050119123816.93586.qmail at web25701.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <20050119123816.93586.qmail at web25701.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1f761737050119085846723d86 at mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:38:16 +0000 (GMT), Jim Raylor
<rjraylor at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I think Maru and Dan'l were merely pointing out the
> parallels in themes, linguistic tricks and aspirations
> between Joyce and Wolfe, which I feel is valid
> comment.
Actually, it was a "litter of protest," against the kind of
reading often directed at _Finnegans Wake_, in which
"it's in there if you can find it, whether or not Joyce
ever intended it."
LIke ferexample: in the passage (in the first section)
about the Willingdone Museyroom (mind yer hat goan
in!), there is a line about the "lipoleum boyce
grouching in their trinches" - spelling is approximate,
from memory - and I knew someone who _insisted_
that this was a reference to the Marx brothers, because
Groucho had worn a Napoleon costume in an early
stage play. (The woman in question was a moderately
talented Joyce scholar and an absolute Marx bros.
fanatic.)
--Dan'l
--
www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
Freedom has no barcode.
--J.G. Ballard
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net